Narrative fact check
Looks for supplied facts missing from the draft and wording that may not be supported by the supplied fact set.
Fact & instruction review
LeoPen compares the working narrative with the supplied fact set, then places documented details beside supported official Florida jury-instruction language and the retained source page.
The instruction workflow supports review of a selected source; it does not choose a charge or turn a checklist into new report facts.
The review language
The current workflow distinguishes reviewed fact matching from manual checklist review and keeps the selection path and source visible.
The review sequence
Each step preserves a clear path between the narrative, the supplied facts, and the official language under review.
The review begins with the facts the officer provided—not facts inferred from a legal checklist.
The product shows whether the instruction was selected automatically or manually.
Reviewed matcher groups place documented facts beside the supported official language.
A possible gap becomes a prompt for the officer, not a new fact in the report.
The underlying document and relevant page remain available before the comparison is relied upon.
Inside the review
Looks for supplied facts missing from the draft and wording that may not be supported by the supplied fact set.
Surfaces questions from report mechanics and supported instruction workflows without answering them for the officer.
Keeps the exact official language and source page available for direct inspection by the reviewer.
Current product coverage is demonstrated with supported Florida jury instructions and synthetic facts during an agency walkthrough.
Schedule a walkthrough